Income Tax : Learn about disallowed expenses under PGBP in India's Income Tax Act. Understand key sections like 37, 40, and 40A, and their impa...
Income Tax : Delhi HC rules reimbursements to NRAEs not subject to TDS as "fees for technical services," clarifying scope of Section 9(1)(vii) ...
Income Tax : Understand the impact of Section 43B(h) on businesses: Learn about deductions for MSME payments and the importance of timely payme...
Corporate Law : Discover the process and types of trademark assignment. Learn about procedures, required documents, and benefits for a smooth tran...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the critical implications of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 on taxpayers' Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility and the ...
Corporate Law : Explore the proposed amendments to Regulations 35, 37, and 50 of the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009. L...
Income Tax : Allowability of Interest paid under Incometax Act, 1961: Presently, interest paid by the Government to an assessee is chargeable t...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that deduction under section 80G of the Income Tax Act eligible towards donations, even if donations are part of ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act not justified since value adopted by the DVO and actua...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that discount on issue of Employee Stock Ownership Plan [ESOP] is allowable as deduction under section 37 of the I...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that the provisioning for Asset Reconstruction Cost qualified the prescriptions of AS 29 and the assessee wa...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance of delayed payment of employees’ contribution to EPF and ESI in terms of section 143(1) of...
The petitioner raised bills on respondent No.4 based on the works executed from time to time, TDS @ 2% on the total value of the bills were recovered by respondent No.4 for the value of works executed in the State of Telangana and Maharashtra.
Delhi High Court held that before undertaking a benchmarking of Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion [AMP expenses], it was incumbent upon the TPO to have found that an international transaction had, in fact, occurred. Thus, appeal of revenue dismissed.
A similar claim for deduction as was raised by assessee-firm in the preceding year had been allowed by the department, but also the fact that the GP/NP rates of assessee firm were progressive as in comparison to the preceding year.
Assessee claimed deduction of IMC Transfer Expenses, City Environment Expenses, Contribution and Aid Expenses, Land Acquisition and Diversion Expenses which the AO disallowed the same.
The assessee acts as a corporate agent for Max Life Insurance Company in respect of marketing it’s insurance policies. The assessee charges commission from Max Life in lieu of rendering such services.
Assessee was specifically asked to justify its claim as the agreement had to be with (a) Central Government (b) State Government (c) Local Authority or (d) Statutory Authority and LMRCL did not fit in any of the four categories.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Hence, revisionary jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act not justifiable as twin pre-conditions not satisfied.
ITAT Delhi held that provision of section 43A of the Income Tax Act not invocable when there is only reinstatement of fluctuation loss as per accounting standards and there is no actual payment or remittance. Thus, appeal allowed.
The assessee is engaged in the business of Manufacturing & Trading of Sarees, Salwar Suites and Dress Materials. A survey u/s 133A of the Act was carried out on the business premises of the assessee on 26.11.2014.
Delhi High Court held that the unlocking/activation of the mobile phone merely makes the mobile phone more usable in the destination country and the same would therefore not constitute “taken into use” under proviso to Rule 3 of Duty Drawback Rules.
