Income Tax : Learn how online gaming habits can lead to income tax scrutiny notices under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understan...
Income Tax : Explore journey of India's tax administration transformation led by PM Narendra Modi. Learn about Faceless Assessment Scheme, prom...
Income Tax : Explore the faceless scheme in Indian income tax, including assessments, appeals, penalties, and rectifications. Discover how it e...
Income Tax : High Court held that Income Tax Faceless assessment order under section 143(3) rws 144B becomes invalid if Assessment is completed...
Income Tax : Facing issues with the Faceless Assessment E-Portal closure without notice? Learn the steps ahead to address grievances. Understan...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The Kerala High Court, today admitted a batch of Writ Petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Faceless Assessment...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that CIT has not applied his mind analytically while assuming jurisdiction for taking cognizance under section 2...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that passing of revisionary order by PCIT u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act without giving proper and adequate op...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that order of PCIT invoking section 263 of the Income Tax Act set aside as conditions necessary for invoking S...
Income Tax : Associated Chambers of Commerce And Industry of India Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Delhi Hig...
Income Tax : Madras High Court held that personal hearing through video conferencing or other mode was not provided inspite of specific request...
Income Tax : CBDT issues guidelines for IT verification under Section 144B(5), detailing circumstances for digital and physical checks, effecti...
Income Tax : In pursuance of sub-section (3) of section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the fo...
Income Tax : Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Assessment Unit (AU), Verification Unit (VU), Technical Unit (TU) and Review Unit (RU) unde...
Income Tax : Roll out of first phase of changes in ITBA functionalities for Faceless Assessment due to amendments in Section 144B by Finance Ac...
Income Tax : National Faceless Penalty Centre, in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Board, may,–– (a) in a case where imposit...
An in-depth analysis of the Calcutta High Court’s decision in Anuj Bakshi Vs ACIT. The court set aside an Income Tax order due to violations of Natural Justice principles.
Gujarat High Court held that notice issued just two days before expiry of limitation and giving only one day time to provide the defence reply is unjustified as petitioner is not granted reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Calcutta High Court denies the writ petition challenging the assessment order u/s 147, emphasizing no objection filed in time. Alternative remedies noted.
Calcutta HC rules a writ petition can’t be entertained if the order is appealable. Insight into Euphoria Infotech India PVT LTD. vs ITO case.
Calcutta HC examines the case of Tribeni Barters Pvt. Ltd., where the wrong PAN was quoted in a reassessment. Court orders presentation of relevant records.
Delhi High Court rules in favour of a woman denied Section 54 tax exemption without hearing. Court mandates fairness and compliance with law.
Read the Madras High Court judgment in Junaitha Begum Vs Assessing Officer case, involving a disputed assessment order and cash deposit addition.
Discover the case of Sohanbir Sing Vs Assessing Officer, where the ITAT Delhi ruled that failure to issue notice for reassessment cannot be remedied under Section 292B of the Income Tax Act.
The Calcutta High Court rejects a writ petition challenging a tax assessment order, reaffirming that a Writ Court does not act as an assessing officer or an appellate authority
Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment, in the exercise of powers under section 147 read with section 148 of the Act, without tangible material to conclude that income had escaped assessment is untenable in law.
