Income Tax : Article discusses about Order which can be rectified under section 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961, Rectification of Income Tax order ...
Income Tax : Explore the implications of taxation under section 115BBE, including misuse of sections 68 to 69D, consequences of high tax rates,...
Income Tax : Every taxpayer has to furnish the details of his income to the Income-tax Department. These details are to be furnished by filing ...
Income Tax : Ensure sufficient time for compliance with Section 143(2) notice and the mandatory issuance of valid notices under Section 142(1)(...
Company Law : Discover the essentials of Internal Financial Controls (IFC) under the Companies Act 2013 effective from 01/04/2023 onwards. Get i...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Explore the detailed analysis of ITO Vs Axisline Investment Consultants Pvt. Ltd. case where ITAT Kolkata deleted Rs. 1.54 crore a...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held in ITO Vs Happy Structure Pvt. Ltd. that share application amount cannot be added twice under Section 68 of In...
Income Tax : Satyam Smertex pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata): Addition made by AO and confirmed by CIT(A) are based on conjectures and surmises...
Income Tax : Explore the detailed analysis of Chetak Enterprises Ltd. Vs ACIT Rajasthan High Court judgment on reopening assessments under Sect...
Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Delhi verdict in Pooja Mittal vs PCIT case, addressing the issues of Long Term Capital Gain...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
Explore the detailed analysis of ITO Vs Axisline Investment Consultants Pvt. Ltd. case where ITAT Kolkata deleted Rs. 1.54 crore addition for share capital under Section 68.
ITAT Kolkata held in ITO Vs Happy Structure Pvt. Ltd. that share application amount cannot be added twice under Section 68 of Income Tax Act in in payees & recipients’ hands u/s 68
Satyam Smertex pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata): Addition made by AO and confirmed by CIT(A) are based on conjectures and surmises, so their impugned action cannot be justified.
Explore the detailed analysis of Chetak Enterprises Ltd. Vs ACIT Rajasthan High Court judgment on reopening assessments under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act. Understand the implications and legal nuances.
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Delhi verdict in Pooja Mittal vs PCIT case, addressing the issues of Long Term Capital Gain and supervisory jurisdiction under Section 263.
If AO adopts a plausible view, even if two views are possible, the assessment cannot be deemed erroneous merely because the PCIT holds a different opinion.
Detailed analysis of the ITAT Jodhpur decision in Gaurav Purohit vs PCIT, covering the grounds of appeal, legal arguments, and implications for future cases.
Explore the full text and detailed analysis of Shah Tracom Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO case from ITAT Kolkata. Understand the implications, legal arguments, and outcomes in tax assessment disputes.
Explore ITAT Kolkata’s ruling on no addition for share capital & premium from group companies with common directors/shareholders. Detailed analysis & conclusion
Explore the detailed analysis of the ITO vs. RKB Services Pvt. Ltd. case by ITAT Kolkata. Learn about the implications for share capital additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
