This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Notice Must for Rectification under Section 154 Reducing Refund: Calcutta HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Arun Kumar Bose Vs ITO (Calcutta High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Calcutta High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Arun Kumar Bose Vs ITO (Calcutta High Court)
The Calcutta High Court addressed a writ petition filed by an assessee, Arun Kumar Bose, challenging an order dated February 7, 2025, issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward No.1 (1), Siliguri. The case originated from the assessment year 2014-2015, where the assessee declared an income of Rs. 10,23,320. Following scrutiny, the Assessing Officer added Rs. 75,18,689 as unexplained sundry creditors, increasing the total income to Rs. 85,42,009. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], who directed the deletion of the ...
