Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : NJ India Invest Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise-Surat-I (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
NJ India Invest Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise-Surat-I (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Service provider is not liable for Service Tax on incentives received for the promotion or marketing of mutual funds The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of NJ India Invest Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise-Surat-I [Service Tax Appeal No. 11758 of 2014 dated June 05, 2024], allowed the appeal filed by setting aside the Service tax demand, thereby holding that incentives from Asset Management Companies (“AMCs”) for mutual fund distribution were exempt under reverse charge, advertisements in the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930