Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : NJ India Invest Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise-Surat-I (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
NJ India Invest Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise-Surat-I (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Service provider is not liable for Service Tax on incentives received for the promotion or marketing of mutual funds The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of NJ India Invest Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise-Surat-I [Service Tax Appeal No. 11758 of 2014 dated June 05, 2024], allowed the appeal filed by setting aside the Service tax demand, thereby holding that incentives from Asset Management Companies (“AMCs”) for mutual fund distribution were exempt under reverse charge, advertisements in the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930