Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mec Shot Blasting Equipment P Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mec Shot Blasting Equipment P Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT Delhi held that mere suppression of facts not enough, for invocation of extended period of limitation, there must be deliberate and wilful attempt to evade payment of duty. Thus, held that invocation of limitation period unjustified in absence of wilful attempt to evade payment of duty. Facts- The appellant is engaged in manufacturing of excisable goods falling under chapter 84 and are availing Cenvat credit of duty and tax paid on inputs and input services and are also registered u/s. 69 ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031