This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT not right in holding that service provided by a consignment agent not covered by sec. 65(25) of Finance Act
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CST Vs. Sangam Investments (Karnataka High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Karnataka High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
When the assessee is a consignment agent, as the definition of C&F agent includes consignment agents, CESTAT was not right in holding that the service provided by a consignment agent is not covered by section 65(25) of the Finance Act, 1994.
CASE LAWS DETAILS
DECIDED BY: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, IN THE CASE OF: CST Vs. Sangam Investments, APPEAL NO: CEA No. 32/2006, DECIDED ON April 8, 2010
FACTS
The revenue has come up in this appeal being aggrieved by the order passed by the CESTAT in Appeal No.ST/08/2004 dated 18.8.2005 in Final Order Nos.1531/2005 and 1532/2005 and Misc.Order No.523 ...
