This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Cenvat credit refund cannot be denied under Rule 5 in absence of any proceedings under Rule 14 of CCR, 2004
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- State Street Syntel Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of CGST & Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
State Street Syntel Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of CGST & Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)
CESTAT Mumbai ruling: Cenvat credit refund cannot be denied without Rule 14 proceedings. Upholds eligibility for input services in export. Case reference: M/s. KKR India Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
The Hon’ble CESTAT agreeing with the submissions of the appellant held that cenvat credit refund cannot be denied/ rejected under Rule 5 of the CCR, 2004 in the absence of any proceedings under Rule 14 of the CCR, 2004. The CESTAT relied on the decision in the case of M/s. KKR India Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
The Honâ...




