Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Adjudicating Officer Vs Bhavesh Pabari (Supreme Court India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 11311 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/02/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

SC grants controlled discretion to Adjudicating Officer under Section 15J of The SEBI Act

The Supreme Court of India ruled in Adjudicating Officer, SEBI v. Bhavesh Pabari (Bhavesh Pabari) granting back the discretionary power to Adjudicating Officer (AO) under supervision and scrutiny of the court. It overruled its previous decision in Roofit Industries v. SEBI ( Roofit Industries). The highlight of the case is that it provided with controlled discretionary power to the AO, granting them the authority to determine the quantum of the penalty when there is non-compliance of any rules mentioned in the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI Act) or Securities Contract Regulation Act (SCR Act). The ruling expanded the scope of Section 15J of the SEBI Act, and stated the fact that the three factors mentioned in Section 15J have to be interpreted as illustrative and not exhaustive in nature; herein providing that the AO has the power to determine the penalty and not limiting it only to the factors mentioned in Section 15J. The court elaborated that the AO will no longer be restricted by the minimum penalty rule and can impose the penalty which is proportional to the gravity of the offense. The AO can impose less penalty than the minimum prescribed in the Section or completely waive it off, after comprehending the nature of the offense. Thus, the court removed irregularities of the section which were primarily caused due to Roofit Industries and paved a path where the penalty imposed is in congruence with the degree of the offense.   

Background   

Section 15J has been a part of SEBI since 1992. The section 15A to 15HA provides for heavy penal punishments as a consequence of non-compliance of any rules. The bottom line is that Section 15A to 15HA provides for the penalty and 15J assists in the determination of penalty amount.  The three components of S. 15J are as follows:   

a) amount of disproportionate gain or unfair advantage.  

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio


Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031