Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Farooqi Gulam Samdani Vs DCIT (ITAT Heyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Farooqi Gulam Samdani Vs DCIT (ITAT Heyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad Quashes 153C Assessment for 22-Month Delay in Recording Satisfaction; ₹1.50 Cr Cash Addition Rendered Academic The Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench of the ITAT, in Shri Farooqi Gulam Samdani vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1(3), Hyderabad (ITA No. 814/Hyd/2025, AY 2019-20), vide order dated 24-12-2025, quashed the assessment framed u/s 153C on the ground of inordinate delay in recording satisfaction and issuing notice. A search u/s 132 was conducted on 22-11-2018 in the case of a third party, during which an agreement of sale allegedly showing c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930