Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT Vs Sakthi Metl Depot (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Kerala High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH
2. The facts leading to the controversy are the following. The respondent-assessee is a firm which was engaged in business with principal place of business at Kochi and a Branch at Mumbai. The assessee purchased a flat at a cost of Rs. 95,000/ in Mumbai for business purposes in the financial year ending on 31.31974. Since purchase of the flat, it was used as Branch Office of the assessee at Mumbai and on the capitalised cost of the building at Rs. 95,000/- the assessee claimed depreciation and the same was allowed until the assessment year 1995- 96. The written down value of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

