Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pr. CIT Vs. M/s .ITD Cemindia JV (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1706 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/02/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pr. CIT Vs. M/s ITD Cemindia JV (Bombay High Court)

The employees and personnel deputed by the company giving such workers on loan to the assessee company continued to be the employer, the assessee merely reimbursed the expenditure in terms of salary structure of the employees to the employer company. There was, therefore, no question of deducting tax at source while reimbursing such costs.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGEMENT

1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging judgment of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “Tribunal”). The appellant Revenue urges following question for our consideration:-

“Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case the ITAT is correct in law in deleting the additions made by the AO in disallowing the reimbursement of the salary and related expenses to the tune of Rs.5,67,80,664/- under Section 40 (a) (ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?”

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031