Case Law Details
Case Name : Shri Dinesh Khemabhai Patel, Vs Income-tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No.2131/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/06/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
It is not the case of the assessee, at this stage, that the AO has not given sufficient opportunity; the case of the assessee is that the additional evidence produced before the CIT(A) ought to have been admitted under Rule 46A. If additional evidence is not admitted, the ld. CIT(A) ought to have furnished reasons
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.