Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hansraj Mathuradas Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hansraj Mathuradas Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Part expenditure subject to FBT, cannot be disallowed on the ground that same are not for the purpose of business

The assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of providing services as insurance surveyor and loss assessor. In one of the grounds before the Tribunal, the assessee had challenged dis allowance made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A), conveyance and telephone expenses of Rs. 4,818/- and Rs. 17,224/- out of Rs. 24.088

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31