Case Law Details
Adinath Vasantrao Wandhekar Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Pune)
The recent order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune in the case of Adinath Vasantrao Wandhekar vs. Income Tax Officer sheds light on the criticism faced by the Assessing Officer (AO) for hastily imposing a penalty at a 200% rate without proper application of mind.
Background: The appellant, an individual retired from the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL), received gratuity and leave encashment as retirement benefits. The AO restricted the exemption claimed by the appellant, leading to additional tax liabilities. Subsequently, penal proceedings were initiated for misreporting of income, resulting in the imposition of a penalty at an accelerated rate of 200%.
Analysis: The ITAT Pune, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, criticized the AO for the hasty imposition of the penalty. The tribunal noted that the appellant’s belief in claiming full exemption of retirement benefits was bonafide, considering the transformation of the appellant’s employer from a government entity to a PSU. Additionally, the appellant disclosed all relevant facts, and the mistaken belief fell within the permissible grounds for penalty waiver under Section 270A(6)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Furthermore, the tribunal highlighted the discretionary nature of penalty imposition and emphasized that it should be exercised judiciously. However, the AO failed to appreciate the holistic view of the case and imposed the penalty perfunctorily without proper application of mind.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
