Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Topsgrup Electronic Systems Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.-2115/MUM/2015, 19/02/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 2009-10
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case:

  • The ITAT bench of Mumbai in the above cited case held that investment in share capital of a subsidiary being an international transaction on capital account  does not result in income as defined under section 2(24) of the Act, the Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. bhavesh mange says:

    Great Judgement by Tribunal. Now a days AO’s are misusing their power & making addition of items like loans which can not be constituted as income of the assesse and raising a huge amount of demand with interest payable on it. Then assesse goes for the appeal but meanwhile hearing of Appeal comes AO start sending the recovery notices . At the end assesse ask for the stay of recovery but he is asked to pay 15% of demand. This is what is happening in lots of cases .

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31