This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Goods cannot be seized for mere transport after one week from Invoice Date: HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco (P.) Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Allahabad High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco (P.) Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)
1. Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned special counsel for the revenue.
Sri Prem Shankar Prasad, Adv. has filed his appearance slip on behalf of the respondent no.2, which is taken on record.
2. The goods have been seized on two grounds, one being discrepancy in the quantity. That discrepancy has been resolved and it is accepted to the department that the quantity of goods as disclosed in the documents is the same as found on physical verifica...
