Fictitious entry not backed up by funds cannot be taxed as Cash Credit

DCIT Vs Glass Tech India (ITAT Delhi)

The facts in brief are, the case of assessee, which is a partnership firm, was selected through CASS for scrutiny and statutory notice u/s 143(2)of the Act was issued. The partners of the assessee had issued capital of Rs. 2 crore each in the firm for which explanation was sought to explain the source of the amount of Rs. 4 crores introduced by the partners in the firm. The assessee informed the Ld. AO that amount was introduced by way of cheques by the two partners but the cheques could

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.