Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sadhana Nayyar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sadhana Nayyar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai disallowed the claim of depreciation under section 32 since assessee failed to prove that car was used for the purpose of assessee’s business wholly or in part. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.

Facts- The assessee claimed to be involved in trading of medical goods and pharmaceuticals in the name and style of M/s. Hansraj Nayyar Medical India. It was found by learned assessing officer that the assessee purchased a new car for Rs. 11,80,474/- and claimed depreciation of Rs. 1,77,071/- on asset being a motor car (

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31