Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sadhana Nayyar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sadhana Nayyar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai disallowed the claim of depreciation under section 32 since assessee failed to prove that car was used for the purpose of assessee’s business wholly or in part. Accordingly, appeal dismissed. Facts- The assessee claimed to be involved in trading of medical goods and pharmaceuticals in the name and style of M/s. Hansraj Nayyar Medical India. It was found by learned assessing officer that the assessee purchased a new car for Rs. 11,80,474/- and claimed depreciation of Rs. 1,77,071/- on asset being a motor car (vento). The car was in the name of a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930