This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Compensation attributable to a negative/restrictive covenant is a capital receipt & Taxable u/s 28(va)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shiv Raj Gupta Vs CIT (Supreme Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Shiv Raj Gupta Vs CIT (Supreme Court)
The issue under consideration is whether the non-compete fee could be taxed under any provision other than Section 28(ii)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
In the present case, a share of the face value of INR 10 and market value of INR 3 was sold for INR 30 as a result of control premium having to be paid. It is important to note that each member of the family was paid for his/her shares in the company, the lion’s share being paid to the assessee’s son and wife as they held the most number of shares within the said. The non-compete fee of INR 6 crores w...
