This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Assessee Must Prove Genuineness to Contest Section 68 Addition for Unexplained Cash Deposits During Demonetization
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Conclusion: Addition under section 68 on account of large cash deposit made during the 2016 demonetization period was not justified and assessee was required to provide concrete evidence establishing the genuineness of the cash deposits in accordance with CBDT Circular wherein the various instructions had been issued. Tribunal remitted the case back to AO for a fresh assessment, instructing assessee to provide all necessary documents to prove the authenticity of the deposits.
Held: During the government’s demoneti...
Author Info
