Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Addition under section 68 on account of large cash deposit made during the 2016 demonetization period was not justified and assessee was required to provide concrete evidence establishing the genuineness of the cash deposits in accordance with CBDT Circular wherein the various instructions had been issued. Tribunal remitted the case back to AO for a fresh assessment, instructing assessee to provide all necessary documents to prove the authenticity of the deposits. Held: During the government’s demonetization drive in N...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031