Case Law Details
Case Name : Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Conclusion: Addition under section 68 on account of large cash deposit made during the 2016 demonetization period was not justified and assessee was required to provide concrete evidence establishing the genuineness of the cash deposits in accordance with CBDT Circular wherein the various instructions had been issued. Tribunal remitted the case back to AO for a fresh assessment, instructing assessee to provide all necessary documents to prove the authenticity of the deposits.
Held: Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.