Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1072/Bang/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/09/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Conclusion: Addition under section 68 on account of large cash deposit made during the 2016 demonetization period was not justified and assessee was required to provide concrete evidence establishing the genuineness of the cash deposits in accordance with CBD

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031