Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Global One India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

When the CBDT itself has clarified that the amended provisions of Section 194I relating to deduction of tax at source for the purpose of Section 40(a)(ia) would be applicable for AY 2007-08, the Assessing Officer was not justified in making the dis allowance. We also find that similar issue came up before the learned CIT (A) in AY 2005-06 wherein he accepted the assessee’s contention.

Though in AY 2005- 06, the Revenue filed the appeal against the order of CIT (A) on this point, but the ground relating to deletion of dis all

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Bhavesh Savla says:

    Such income tax officers who deliberately harass the assessee in spite of the facts being extremely clear should be fined and the costs incurred by the assessee for representation before the CIT and the Tribunal recovered from the salary of such income tax officers.   

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031