This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deduction u/s 35(2AB) can’t denied, merely because of no approval of expenditure
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Advance Enzyme Technologies Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advance Enzyme Technologies Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
The issue under consideration is whether the A.O. is correct in disallowing the deduction u/s 35 (2AB) to the assessee?
The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing enzymes (biotechnology products). The company has set up in house Research & Development (R & D) labs, in Thane and Sinnar for R& D activity, which is also, integrated part of business activities of the assessee. The A.O has denied deduction claimed u/s 35(2AB) of the Act, on the ground that, R&D facility has not been approved from the competent auth...





