Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ravi Developments Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ravi Developments Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Conclusion: Addition of bogus purchase by AO was not justified on borrowed satisfaction from the Value added tax (VAT) department without proper cross-verification.

Held: During the assessment proceedings, the purchase was disallowed by AO @ 91% of the total purchase. The addition was made fully depending on the available documents from the VAT authorities. No cross verification was allowed by AO. Assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A). The

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930