Case Law Details
VSM Weavess India Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court)
Introduction: In a recent verdict, the Madras High Court addressed the case of VSM Weavess India Private Limited versus the Assistant Commissioner (ST). The dispute revolves around the denial of a refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to alleged deficiencies. The court examined the grounds cited in the deficiency memos and provided significant insights into the interpretation of GST laws.
Detailed Analysis: VSM Weavess India, a textile manufacturing company, asserted its eligibility for an ITC refund arising from the inverted duty structure. The company highlighted that the tax paid on raw material (viscose yarn) at 12% exceeded the tax payable on the final product (viscose fabrics) taxed at 5%. Additionally, the petitioner engaged in export sales, claiming a refund of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) for zero-rated supplies.
The deficiency memos issued by the respondent, however, raised objections. One primary contention was that since the petitioner received a refund for zero-rated exports, it was disqualified from claiming a refund for unutilized ITC under Section 54 of the GST Act. Another ground for rejection cited delays in making debit entries for the refund claims.
The court scrutinized these reasons, emphasizing that a refund for zero-rated exports does not bar a separate claim for unutilized ITC. It highlighted the distinct provisions under Section 54, allowing refunds for both scenarios. Regarding the delay in debit entries, the court acknowledged that statutory conditions, once fulfilled, should not be a basis for rejection. The absence of debit entries cannot override legitimate refund claims.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
