Central Government has inserted a new rule in CGST Rules, 2017, Rule 86B, providing for restrictions on use of amount available in electronic credit ledger. This rule shall be applicable from 1st January, 2021 and has an over-riding effect over other rules. It states that the registered person shall not use the amount available in electronic credit ledger to discharge his liability towards output tax in excess of ninety-nine per cent. of such tax liability, in cases where the value of taxable supply other than exempt supply and zero-rated supply, in a month exceeds fifty lakh rupees. This is subject to certain restrictions and conditions of eligibility.
Rule 86B (Restriction on use of Input Tax Credit for discharging the output liability) has been inserted into CGST Rules, 2017. The salient features of Rule 86B are as follows-
a) Rule 86B has an overriding impact on any other rule-This rule starts with the non-obstante clause and has an overriding impact on any other provision of the Rules.
b) Rule casts a restriction on use of ITC while discharging output liability-This rule casts a restriction on registered person on use of amount available in electronic credit ledger to discharge liability towards output tax.
c) Applicable on registered persons having value of taxable supply other than exempt supply and zero-rated supply, in a month exceeding fifty lakh rupees-This rule is applicable on the registered person whose value of taxable supply other than exempt supply and zero-rated supply, in a month exceeds fifty lakh rupees. This limit is not be checked with respect to preceding financial year but for each month for which return is being filed. Therefore, in cases wherein turnover of taxable supply would be less than 50 Lakh then this restriction would not be applicable and supposedly in subsequent month, if the turnover exceeds 50 Lakh, then restriction would have to be checked.
d) Output liability cannot be discharged in excess of 99% by utilising Input Tax credit-The said registered persons cannot use Input Tax Credit in excess of ninety-nine per cent of output tax liability.
e) Exceptions carved out for applicability of the Rule
(i) Payment of Income Tax of more than one lakh rupees- Rule 86B would not be applicable in cases wherein the persons mentioned hereinbelow have deposited amount of more than one lakh rupees as income tax under the Income-Tax Act, 1961(43 of 1961)–
The eligibility check would be made in each of the last two financial years for which the time limit to file return of income under subsection (1) of section 139 of the said Act has expired.
(ii) Refund of ITC towards Zero Rated Supplies of Goods or services or both- Rule 86B would not be applicable in cases wherein registered person has received a refund amount of more than one lakh rupees in the preceding financial year on account of unutilised input tax credit under clause (i) of first proviso of subsection (3) of section 54 i.e. zero rated supplies made without payment of tax. It would be apt to highlight that the refund should have been received in the preceding financial year.
(iii) Refund of Input Tax Credit due to Inverted Duty Structure-the registered person has received a refund amount of more than one lakh rupees in the preceding financial year on account of unutilised input tax credit under clause (ii) of first proviso of subsection (3) of section 54 i.e. Inverted duty structure. It would be apt to highlight that the refund should have been received in the preceding financial year.
(iv) Cumulative discharge of tax liability of more than 1% during the financial year- Restriction in Rule 86B is not applicable wherein cumulatively upto the said month in the current financial year registered person has discharged his liability towards output tax through the electronic cash ledger for an amount which is in excess of 1% of the total output tax liability. Therefore, while filing return for each month, taxpayer now has to make keep a track that whether his cumulative discharge of tax liability of output tax through electronic cash ledger is more than 1% upto the month of filing of return.
(v) Specified Registered persons-Restriction under Rule 86B is not applicable in cases wherein the registered person is Government Department; or a Public Sector Undertaking; or a local authority; or a statutory body.
(vi) Commissioner or an office authorized by him empowered to remove the said restriction after such verification-The rule empowers the Commissioner or an officer authorized by him in this behalf to remove the said restriction after such verifications and such safeguards as he may deem fit.
1) The new rule overrides all other existing rules which implies that this has to be mandatory followed in all cases.
2) Taxpayer shall be mandatorily required to pay 1% of the tax liability in cash despite there being balance in the electronic credit ledger.
3) In other words, the maximum amount which can be availed by way of ITC shall be 99% of the tax liability. Though there is a threshold limit of 50 lakhs p.a., this will apply to all FADA members as there turnover would in any case be more than 50 lakh p.a.
4) However, this will also be not applicable to firm / company whose proprietor or partner or MD or WTD pays more than Rs. 1 lakh as income tax. Since this may be the case in most of the cases the rule may be sparing be applicable to dealers only.
5) There will be no relation in case of new businesses
6) The restriction imposed are subject to certain conditions as discussed above.
7) Restrictions imposed by Rule 86B will further increase the compliance burden for the taxpayers
Thus, one percent of the tax liability will always remain unavailed for which refund will also not be granted.
However, CBIC has clarified that the new rule provides for various exemptions like exporters, suppliers of goods of inverted duty structure, taxpayers having a footprint in the Income Tax data base etc. It is expected that this rule would be applicable to less than 0.5% of total taxpayer base of 1.2 crore. The rule clearly identifies where the risk to revenue is high and imposes deterrence to the fraudsters in a multi-layered fraud of passing fake ITC. This rule would help to control such fraudsters, who issue fake invoices and show high turnovers, but have no financial credibility and flee after misusing ITC without payment of any tax liability in cash.
There is a general perception amongst taxpayers that such a requirement may add to compliance burden and also put a pressure on working capital. However, this one percent requirement is on the tax amount and not that on turnover. CBIC has also clarified that the cash payment of 1% is to be calculated on the tax liability in a month and not turnover of the month. In fact, it amounts to only 0.01 % of turnover. For example, if a dealer has made sale of Rs 1 crore of the goods whose tax rate is 12% and if he is discharging his tax liability more than 99% through ITC, then he has to pay only Rs 12,000 under this rule. On the other hand, a composition dealer would have paid Rs 1 lakh in cash with this volume of sale.
This will also not effect small businesses as it is applicable to the registered person whose value of taxable supply other than exempt supply and export, in a month exceeds Rs 50 lakh that means those whose annual turnover is more than Rs 6 crore. Therefore, the new rule does not apply to micro and small businesses, and Composition dealers.
Further, such 1% requirement is applicable to only those registered persons whose value of taxable supply, other than exempt supply and export, in a month exceeds Rs 50 lakh that means those whose annual turnover is more than Rs 6 crore. The new rule is also not applicable in the cases where the registered person has / is :
(a) deposited more than Rs 1 lakh rupees as Income Tax in each of the last two years,
(b) received a refund of more than Rs 1 lakh in the preceding financial year on account of export or inverted tax structure.
(c) paid output tax through cash in excess of 1% of the total output tax liability, applied cumulatively, up to the month in the current financial year
(d) a government department, PSU, local authority or statutory body
Besides, the registered persons falling in any of the exempted category including paying Rs 1 lakh as Income Tax in each of the last two financial year or having received refund of more than Rs 1 lakh in the previous year on account of export or inverted duty structure, etc. are also out of purview of this rule. With these exemptions and conditions and precise targeting, the requirement of mandatory payment of at least 1% of the tax liability in cash would apply only to risky or suspicious taxpayers and genuine taxpayers would remain excluded.