Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Palak Designer Diamond Jewellery Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Special Civil Application No. 16599 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/01/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Palak Designer Diamond Jewellery Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)

It is an admitted position that in terms of the show cause notice, the total amount of tax payable on the seized goods, totally valued at Rs.15,58,59,711/- is Rs.46,75,791/-. Adding 50% towards penalty, the total amount would come to approximately Rs.70 lakhs. The petitioner has already deposited Rs.14,16,868/- by way of challan and has reversed credit of SGST to the tune of Rs.7,90,793/-, which comes to approximately Rs.22 lakhs. Under the circumstances, if the petitioner furnishes bank guarantee of Rs.50 lakhs and a bond for the value of the goods in FORM GST INS-04, the interest of justice would be served.

In the light of the above discussion, without entering into the merits of the controversy, the petition is partly allowed in the following terms.

The respondents No.2 and 3 are directed to forthwith provisionally release the seized goods of the petitioner under sub-section (6) of section 67 of the CGST Act, upon the petitioner executing a bond in FORM GST INS-04 for the total value of the seized goods, and furnishing a bank guarantee of Rs.50 lakhs.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031