Input tax credit (ITC) is the tax paid by the buyer on the purchase of goods or services. Such tax which is paid at the purchase when reduced from liability payable on outward supplies is known as an input tax credit. In other words, the input tax credit is tax reduced from output tax payable on account of sales.
In the present Scenario Under the GST law, the eligibility of input tax credit has been made subject to deposit of the tax by Supplier and filing of valid returns by Supplier.
Before Understanding the Interest applicability need to understand the meaning of some terms:
Meaning of Interest
There is no specific meaning given in GST law but in the Case of Pratibha Processors Vs Union of India (1996) 88 (ELT) 12 (SC), the apex court at para
13 observed as :
In fiscal Statutes, the import of the words — “tax”, “interest”, are different concepts. Tax is the amount payable as a result of the charging provision. It is a compulsory exaction of money by a public authority for public purposes, the payment of which is enforced by law. The penalty is ordinarily levied on an Assessee for some contumacious conduct or for a deliberate violation of the provisions of the particular statute. Interest is compensatory in character and is imposed on an Assessee who has withheld payment of any tax as and when it is due and payable. The levy of interest is geared to the actual amount of tax withheld and the extent of the delay in paying the tax on the due date. Essentially, it is compensatory and different from a penalty — which is penal in character
Meaning of Claimed
“Claimed” means you are to qualify the following parameters/conditions:-
(i) Invoice is within one year
(ii) Goods(inputs) have been received physically in the factory.
(iii) Inputs are not in the list of (ineligible inputs/input services under Section 17(5) of CGST Act & other Sections, if relevant.
(iv) Payment has been made against the invoice.
(v) If under RCM, cash payment has been made.
and so on.
Meaning of Availed
After crossing the stage of ‘claim’ you will avail ITC in your books of accounts and other statutory records i.e. in various returns and declarations.
Thus the words “availed” and “Claimed” both are prior to utilization.
Legal Provisions for ITC under GST Law
Section 16 of the CGST Act talks about the eligibility and conditions of taking input tax credit . This section only prescribes that what is eligible for claiming credit and what are the conditions to be met for availment of an input tax credit.
Rule 37 prescribes the manner of reversal of Cenvat credit in case of nonpayment of consideration.
Further Rule 42 prescribes the manner in which the input tax credit can be taken in case of business is providing taxable as well as exempt supply.
Rule 43 prescribes the reversal of ITC on capital goods.
Rule 44 prescribes the manner of reversal of Cenvat credit in special circumstances.
Rule 44 A prescribes the manner of reversal of credit of Additional duty of Customs in respect of Golden bar.
Reason for Reversal of ITC
There are Some Reasons to required reversal of ITC
Section 50 of GST: – Interest on Delayed Payment of Tax
(1) Every person who is liable to pay tax in accordance with the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, but fails to pay the tax or any part thereof to the Government within the period prescribed, shall for the period for which the tax or any part thereof remains unpaid, pay, on his own, interest at such rate, not exceeding eighteen percent, as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council.
(2) The interest under sub-section (1) shall be calculated, in such manner as may be prescribed, from the day succeeding the day on which such tax was due to be paid.
(3) A taxable person who makes an undue or excess claim of input tax credit under sub-section (10) of section 42 or undue or excess reduction in output tax liability under sub-section (10) of section 43, shall pay interest on such undue or excess claim or on such undue or excess reduction, as the case may be, at such rate not exceeding twenty-four percent, as may be notified3 by the Government on the recommendations of the Council.
As required, the rates were notified vide Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax dated 28.6.2017 prescribed 18% as rate of interest for Section 50(1) and 24% under Section 50(3). Accordingly, we and that a higher rate of interest is applicable in case of Section 50(3) [covering cases of nonmatching of ITC], than in case of Section 50(1) [nonpayment of tax].
This clearly shows that the legislature has placed wrongful availment of ITC as a higher offense than nonpayment of tax. However, the section was particular in placing limited action of the taxpayer in respect of ITC under Section 50(3).
Section 50(3) provides for levy of interest only in two cases:
Case 1: When a taxable person makes an undue or excess claim of input tax
credit under sub-section (10) of section 42: or
Case 2: When a taxable person makes an undue or excess reduction in output tax liability under subsection (10) of section 43.
The amount reduced from the output tax liability in contravention of the provisions of sub-section (7) shall be added to the output tax liability of the recipient in his return for the month in which such contravention takes place and such recipient shall be liable to pay interest on the amount so added at the rate specified in sub-section (3) of section 50.
The amount reduced from output tax liability in contravention of the provisions of sub-section (7) shall be added to the output tax liability of the supplier in his return for the month in which such contravention takes place and such supplier shall be liable to pay interest on the amount so added at the rate specified in sub-section (3) of section 50.
The higher rate was prescribed only in cases of chronic defaulters who even after intimation are not ready to pay the tax so claimed wrongfully. It was not the intent to punish every taxpayer with such a high rate in normal cases and without a matching facility being made available to the recipient. At present, the date of ling of GSTR -2 has been extended and thus, matching is also extended till such time. In such a scenario, Section higher interest under Section 50(3) cannot be imposed on the taxpayer who has availed an Input Tax Credit which is liable to be reversed by him. The same should be equated with tax not properly paid by such taxpayer and should be eligible to interest at the rate of 18%.
Section 73 And 74
As regards penalty, Section 73 provides that the notice may require the person who has wrongly availed or utilised Input Tax Credit to show cause as to why
he should not pay the amount specified in the notice along with interest and a penalty leviable under the provisions of the Act or rules made thereunder. Whereas, Section 74 provides that the notice shall be required to show cause as why the amount specified in the notice along with interest and ‘penalty equivalent to tax specified in the notice’ shall not be paid by him.
Rules 42 And 43
As per Rule 42 2(a) ITC on Exempted Supply reversed by the registered person in FORM GSTR-3B or through FORM GST DRC-03 in the month not later than the month of September following the end of the financial year to which such credit relates and the said person shall be liable to pay interest on the said excess amount at the rate specified in sub-section (1) of section 50 for the period starting from the first day of April of the succeeding financial year till the date of payment;
Same as on Rule 43(2)(a) ITC on ineligible Capital Goods shall be reversed by the registered person in FORM GSTR-3B or through FORM GST DRC-03 in the month not later than the month of September following the end of the financial year in which the completion certificate is issued or the first occupation takes place of the project and the said person shall be liable to pay interest on the said excess amount at the rate specified in sub-section (1) of section 50 for the period starting from the first day of April of the succeeding financial year till the date of payment; or
Now the question is Can Rule Override the Section where nothing is talking about interest on reversal of unutilised ITC. The answer is Negative because The Rules were meant only for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the Act and they could not take away what was conferred by the Act or cutting down its effect.” This has been decided in Gujarat High court in the case of VKC Footstep India P Ltd,
In Case of M/s Commercial Steel Engineering Corporation, Patna high court the Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes has somewhere got confused to treat the transitional credit claimed by the dealer as an availment of the said credit when in fact an availment of a credit is a positive act and unless carried out for reducing any tax liability by its reflection in the return filed for any financial year, it cannot be a case of either availment or utilization. Had it been a case where the credit shown in electronic ledger, was availed or utilized for meeting any tax liability for any year, there would be no error found in the action complained but it would be stretching the term ‘availment’ beyond prudence to treat the mere reflection of the transitional credit in the electronic credit ledger as an act of availment, for drawing a proceeding under section 73(1).
Section 73 is self eloquent and it is only if such availment is for reducing a tax liability that it vests jurisdiction in the assessing authority to recover such tax
together with levy of interest and penalty under section 50 but until such time that the statutory authority is able to demonstrate that any tax was recoverable from the petitioner, a reflection in the electronic credit ledger cannot be treated as an ‘availment’.
A Study of all relevant sections and Rules its conflict with each other. In Section Interest applicable on Delay payment of GST or undue or excess claim of the input tax credit as per Section 42(10) and 43(10). There is no specific mention of Interest on Unutilized Credit reversal. Rules marked regarding charging of Interest as per rate section 50 (1) but the rule cannot override the section in which there is no Interest mention on reversal of unutilised ITC. Mismatching of Section and Rules create litigations and ultimately Assessee will suffer.
In my opinion after the study of act and case law understanding, Interest will be applicable on ITC reversal if its wrongly reduced the Output tax liability or claim Ineligible ITC as per Section 16 but if Eligible ITC has not utilised for reducing of Output Tax Liability, only shown in Credit ledger and reversal of unutilized credit Interest will not be applicable.
CA (Dr) PIYUSH KAPOOR