Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : N. Raveendran Vs Shajahan (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : CRL.A No. 1344 of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/09/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

N. Raveendran Vs Shajahan (Kerala High Court)

The absence of salutation Like Mr./M/s. while drawing the cheque by accused cannot be a ground for the accused to be acquitted from proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF KERALA HIGH COURT

This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 04.05.2006 in C.C. No.453/2004 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Muvattupuzh. C.C. No. 453/2004 was a complaint filed alleging the commission of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The appellant/complainant is the Managing Partner of a firm by name ‘Lakshmi Finance‘, which is stated to be a partnership firm. Reading of the judgment dated 04.05.2006 in C.C. No. 453/2004 shows that the accused was acquitted on the sole ground that the subject cheque was drawn in favour of ‘Lakshmi Finance’ and not ‘M/s.Lakshmi Finance’, though it is seen from the partnership deed that the name of the firm is ‘M/s.Lakshmi Finance’.

3. Though the notice ordered in this appeal to the 1st respondent/accused was duly served on the 1st respondent/accused, there is no appearance for the 1st The alphabets ‘M/s’ which is short form for ‘Messrs’ is normally a salutation intended to refer to a group of unincorporated persons, such as a partnership firm. The absence of such salutation while drawing the cheque by the 1st respondent/accused cannot be a ground for the accused to be acquitted. Such a view is as good as saying that if the payee is not referred to in the cheque as “Mr………. “, the accused has to be acquitted.

In the result, this appeal is allowed, the judgment dated 04.05.2006 in C.C. No. 456/2004 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Muvattupuzha, acquitting the 1st respondent/accused is set aside. C.C. No. 453/2004 will stand restored to the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Muvattupuzha, for disposal, in accordance with law. It is made clear that the trial court may proceed from the stage before the pronouncement of the judgment dated 04.05.2006 in that case. C.C. No. 453/2004 shall be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the judgment. The appellant/complainant shall appear before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Muvattupuzha on 15.09.2021. The court shall issue fresh summons to the 1st respondent/accused and will thereafter, proceed to dispose of the matter in accordance with law.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728