Manufacturing exporters has little scope for utilization of accumulated CENVAT credit

Raychem RPG Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

Introduction: The case of Raychem RPG Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of GST before CESTAT Mumbai revolves around the partial rejection of a claim for a refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant, a hundred percent export-oriented unit (EOU), challenges the denial of accumulated CENVAT credit, highlighting issues of ineligibility, procedural lapses, and the restoration of credit after previous rejections. This article

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.