Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Atco Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 10707 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/10/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Atco Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT Ahmedabad held that as there was no manufacture of fresh goods there cannot be a duty demand under rule 173H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 merely for reason of clearance after 6 months.

Facts-

The main issue involved in these Appeals is whether “Polycarbonate Containers” were received back by Appellant – Atco Industries Ltd, in terms of Rule 173H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on account of rejection by buyers due to quality issues and which were repaired and cleared in terms of Rule 173H as contended by the Appellant or were in fact, fresh Containers manufactured and cleared in the guise of repaired containers as alleged by Revenue and therefore liable to duty.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031