This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Rule 9(1)(e) of Valuation Rules could not be applied to every Import which was not dependent on one other
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner of Customs (Port) Kolkata Vs Steel Authority of India Ltd. (Supreme Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Commissioner of Customs (Port) Kolkata Vs Steel Authority of India Ltd. (Supreme Court)
Conclusion: Authorities was not justified in holding that it was a turnkey project, importation of equipment and post-importation project implementation exercise were mutually dependent as reading such implied conditions into the contracts would be impermissible in the absence of any other material to demonstrate subsistence of such conditions. Thus, section 14, rule 4, rule 9 (1)(e) of Customs Valuation (Determination of Price) of Imported Goods Valuation Rules, 1988 could not be automatically applied to e...
