This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Goods ordered to be provisionally released after complying with requirement are not liable for confiscation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Unik Traders Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Unik Traders Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai held that confiscation of goods cannot be sustained as imported goods are provisionally released after complying with the necessary requirement of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955.
Facts- On the basis of intelligence that “Monosodium Glutamate”, a food additive used as flavouring agent has been imported in violation of the provisions of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA Act) and the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 (PFA Rules) read with provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, the D.R...
Author Info
