Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Unik Traders Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Unik Traders Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that confiscation of goods cannot be sustained as imported goods are provisionally released after complying with the necessary requirement of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. Facts- On the basis of intelligence that “Monosodium Glutamate”, a food additive used as flavouring agent has been imported in violation of the provisions of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA Act) and the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 (PFA Rules) read with provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, the D.R...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930