Since no incriminating material was unearthed by AO during the course of search operation under section 132, therefore no addition could be made during the relevant assessment year under section 153A by reopening the assessment on the matter, which was examined earlier during original assessment.
Section 174(2)(c) of CGST Act, 2017 prima facie seems to preserve the levy insofar as any liability to pay tax was incurred by the individual or concern. Court is of the opinion that the present writ petition cannot be maintained. It is open to the Writ petitioner to raise all contentions including levy and extent of levy of service tax before the adjudicating officer concerned. Writ petition is disposed of.
Where the intention of assessee for purchase of the land was for resale and within a short period of time though the sale was only to the companies of which the assessee was a director, it was apparent that assessee was acting as an interface to purchase the lands from the land owners and then converted in non-agricultural use and sold to these companies who were in the business of real estate. Hence, properties sold were not excluded from the meaning of capital asset, as they were not agricultural land as defined by section 2(14).
Pr. CIT Vs Roshan Lal Sancheti (Rajasthan High Court) it must be held that statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act and later confirmed in statement recorded under section 131 of the Act, cannot be discarded simply by observing that the assessee has retracted the same because such retraction ought to have been generally […]
Pr. CIT Vs Khaitan Chemicals Ltd. (Rajsthan High Court) HC observed that the issue of classification of income on the sale of shares as business income or as short-term capital gains is to be decided the facts of each case. The tests to be applied for such determination is provided in CBDT Circular No.4 of […]
CIT Vs Gettwell Health and Education Samiti (Rajasthan High Court) Where the Commissioner does not pass any order even after six months from receipt of Tribunal’s order remitting the matter to him, the registration under section 12AA will be deemed to have been granted. This is subject to exercise of Commissioner’s power under Section 12AA(3) […]
etitioners have claimed tax input credit on the basis of fake invoices hence Writ Petition is dismissed with cost of Rs.1,00,000/- only.29. The cost amount be deposited with the Rajasthan High Court Legal Services Authority within four weeks of the date of this order and proof thereof, be submitted with the Registrar (Judicial). If the proof of depositing of amount is not submitted, let the matter be listed before the Court for appropriate course of action.
Sandeep Goyal Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in Criminal Complaint No.35/2018 for offence under Sections 132(1)(b)(c)(d)(f)(i) & (i) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 132(1), (i) & (iv) of Central Goods […]
Learned counsel for the Union of India has opposed the petition and has submitted that the offence committed by the accused is serious in nature. In-fact, the accused had issued bogus invoices without actual movement of goods which led to involvement of fraudulent input taxes amounting to Rs.40.58 crores. Admittedly, company has deposited Rs.6.95 crores with the concerned authority towards non-payment of G.S.T. Case is still under investigation.
Jodhpur Truck Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Section 140 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 confers a right to a registered dealer to take credit of ‘eligible duties’ of the amount lying unutilized on the day immediately preceding the appointed day, in the manner prescribed. First proviso to […]
