Read how ITAT Mumbai ruled in Jatin Enterprises vs ACIT case, quashing a penalty notice containing concealed and inaccurate income particulars.
ITAT Mumbai affirms 12.5% profit addition confirmed by NFAC in ITO Vs Rajesh Amulakhrai Sanghvi case for AY 2009-10. Detailed analysis of the order and its implications.
Discover the detailed analysis of the case National Stock Exchange of India vs. DCIT where ITAT Mumbai ruled that NSE’s contribution to Core SGF is not considered a contingency reserve.
AC Chokshi Share Brokers Pvt Ltd appeals against disallowed legal expenses for out-of-court settlement & defense. ITAT Mumbai orders readjudication. Details here.
ITAT Mumbai held that the expenses excluded from the export turnover have to be excluded from the total turnover as well while computing deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that as there is complete uniformity in not charging interest from AEs and Non-AEs for delay in realization of export proceeds, addition of notional interest in respect of transactions with AEs in the course of transfer pricing proceedings unwarranted.
ITAT Mumbai held that income by way of interest on loans given for residential purposes for period less than 5 years is eligible for deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that the payment made towards interconnect usage charges to foreign telecom operators does not accrue or arise in India and in the absence of any permanent establishment in India could not be brought to tax in India under Article 7 of DTAA.
ITAT Mumbai held that once assessee’s claim of deduction u/s. 80IA of the Income Tax Act on Supa Wind Power Project 17 MW Unit has been accepted in the initial Assessment Year, the same cannot be denied in the subsequent Assessment Years.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Ecokrin Hygiene Pvt. Ltd., deleting additions under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act solely based on the expiration of the limitation period.
