The appellant’s claim of facing technical glitches in generating Form 26A was acknowledged, leading to the tribunal directing a fresh adjudication.
ITAT Mumbai held that exemption under section 10(23D) of the Income Tax Act is available to UTI India Fund Unit Scheme 1986 as it is one of the scheme listed at sr. no. 37 in schedule II of the Repeal Act.
In the case of Crescent Chemicals Vs ITO, ITAT directs AO to restrict disallowance percentages for Business Promotion, Conveyance, and Office Maintenance expenses, providing relief to the assessee.
Deepak Novochem Technologies Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Introduction: The appeals by Deepak Novochem Technologies Ltd. against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-50, Mumbai, for assessment years 2014-15 to 2018-19, present a complex set of issues. The primary focus revolves around the disallowance of deductions under section 35(2AB) of the Income-tax Act, […]
ITAT Mumbai quashes assessment order in Ghanshyam Sagarmal Modi vs. ACIT case. Non-appearance justified; CIT(A)’s ex-parte decision overturned.
Explore the legal intricacies as ITAT Mumbai delves into the dispute over undisclosed income, cash receipts, and the application of Section 69A in the case of Madhu Developers
ITAT Mumbai held that provisions of section 40A(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act are applicable in cases, wherein, the director of subsidiary company, to whom payment has been made, has substantial interest in the assessee.
ITAT Mumbai dismisses appeal in Shalini Karan Kumar case. Non-appearance and failure to submit documentation for exemption claim under section 54 of Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that surplus on redemption of treasury bills is taxable under the head Capital Gains and not under the head ‘Profits and Gains of Business’.
Read the full text of ITAT Mumbai’s order in Rohinton Homi Sanga Vs DCIT case. No income tax addition for an employee acting on behalf of company directors. Analysis and conclusion provided.
