Shiva Kumar Deora vs. Union of India – Jharkhand High Court held that proper officer under GST should not be requiring or forcing or coercing a person so summoned to give statement after office hours.
There was sufficient evidence collected by the respondent Enforcement Directorate to prima facie come to the conclusion that assessee were actively involved in the offence of Money Laundering as defined in Section 3 of the PMLA.
Learn how the Jharkhand High Court ruled on interest for late GST returns, why liability disputes matter, and the impact on East India Udyog Ltd.
Gopikrishna Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Vs State of Jharkhand (Jharkhand High Court) Contractors are entitled to reimbursement of the GST impact also on indirect transactions on which GST was imposed.
Jharkhand High Court imposes penalty on JBVNL for unjust retention of Rs 2.9 crore, orders refund of TDS. Detailed analysis of Anvil Cables Pvt Ltd vs State of Jharkhand case.
The case of Urmila International Services Private Limited versus Jharkhand State Beverages Corporation Limited shed light on the obligations of placement agencies and the circumstances under which they can be held accountable for monetary losses incurred by JSBCL.
Understand the Jharkhand High Court’s stance on reviewing judgments based on subsequently overturned laws. Analysis of Adarsh Sahkari Grih Nirman Swawlambi Samiti Limited Vs CIT.
Explore the Jharkhand High Court judgment on Abdul Satar appeal for revoking GST registration cancellation under Section 30 of CGST Act due to failure in filing returns.
In a landmark judgment by Jharkhand High Court, Bhavesh Kant Jha wins 19 years’ salary for wrongful termination. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
Jharkhand High Court held that pre-show cause notice consultation u/s. 28(1)(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 are mandatory and imperative in character. Accordingly, entire proceedings carried out without pre-show cause notice consultation is liable to be quashed.
