In ground No. 1 of the appeal, the assessee has challenged the initiation of proceedings u/s. 147 of the Act for deposition of cash of Rs. 1057000 in the saving bank account during the financial year 2006-07 based on AIR Information and not filing of return of income by the assessee.
Kamla Devi Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Non-issuance of notice under section 143(2) was not a procedural error which could have been corrected in the wake of deeming provisions of section 292BB. Thus, assessment completed under section 143(3) read with section 147 was quashed. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed […]
There is no condition for co-operative society to be engaged in the activity of providing credits to the members or banking business for availing of the deduction under section 80P(2)(d).
Merely because the new house is constructed on a plot of land owned by the mother of the assessee will not disentitle the assesee for claim of deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act.
Holding period for purpose of transfer u/s 2(47) was to be considered from the time of agreement to sale instead of execution of sale deed
Undisputedly, interest-free funds available with assessee were far in excess of amount advanced to sister concern and a presumption would arise in favour of the assessee that interest-free funds had been utilized for advancing interest free loan to the sister cocnern, therefore, disallowance of deduction under section 36(1)(iii) was not justified.
LOAN AND ADVANCES –Interest free funds available with the assessee is in excess of amount advanced to sister concern. There is no nexus between the interest bearing funds and the money so advanced to sister concern which has been established by AO. In view of the same, a presumption will arise in favour of assessee that interest free funds have been utilized for advancing such advance to sister concern.
Once the assessment in the hands of AOP has been made then the assessment of the same income in the individual capacity tantamount to double assessment of the same income, which is impermissible in the eyes of law.
Once the income of the assessee was estimated after rejection of books of account, then, the AO could not make disallowance on the same books of account for the purpose of disallowance by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) or general disallowance under section 37(1). Hence, the disallowance made by the AO was deleted.
It has been clearly mentioned that the capital gain income has been declared in the return of income of Smt. Gyanwati Dhakar, who has actually sold this property. The assessee has just signed as a confirming party.
