The ITAT Delhi has upheld the enhanced addition of Advertising & Marketing Expenses in the case of HPL Additives Ltd Vs DCIT, citing the failure to substantiate the business purpose of the expenses.
Examination of the case between Tripoto Travel Private Limited and the ACIT, where ITAT directed re-adjudication on the income tax deduction claim for late deposit of employees’ contributions to PF/ESI.
In Lease Plan India P Ltd vs. ITO, the ITAT Delhi deletes disallowance of guarantee commission deduction claimed on payment to Associate Enterprise. Understand the impact of this case on associated tax implications.
Delve into the latest Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi’s judgement on the case of DCIT Vs Vinod Kumar Bajaj, discussing the illegality of income determination based on conjecture and presumption.
Discover the case of Sohanbir Sing Vs Assessing Officer, where the ITAT Delhi ruled that failure to issue notice for reassessment cannot be remedied under Section 292B of the Income Tax Act.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi has ruled in favor of Aman Kumar Jain against the Income Tax Officer, permitting rent paid to a wife as eligible for HRA deduction under section 10(13A) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that huge amount as interest free advances given to company which is neither relative/ partner nor connected with Assessee based on MOU which is neither on stamp paper nor stamped or registered creates a reasonable doubt. Matter remanded for further inquiry.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards unsecured loan under section 68 of the Income Tax Act sustained as assessee failed to discharge the primary onus and burden of proof of providing genuineness, creditworthiness and identity of creditors to the satisfaction of the A.O.
Key takeaways from the Pawanveer Singh vs ITO case: ITAT Delhi calls for fresh adjudication concerning the income tax on a settlement sum received from a mother-in-law.
The ITAT Delhi nullifies the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on Meena Singhal, as the notice issued did not specify the particular charge.
