New Delhi ITAT explains that Explanation 3 to Sec 147 can’t justify additions unrelated to reasons for reopening. Read the detailed analysis.
ITAT Delhi held that in absence of mentioning the date of handing over of material, date of satisfaction note shall be considered for the purpose of assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153C of the Act and completion of assessment thereafter.
ITAT Delhi held that once the reassessment order passed by AO is not sustainable in the eyes of law, any revision order passed u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act seeking to revise such reassessment order cannot be accepted in the eyes of law. Accordingly, revision order passed u/s. 263 quashed.
Trinity Global Enterprises Ltd. vs. ITO: No disallowance under 40A(2) for supervision and risk management charges. Detailed analysis and conclusions provided.
ITAT Delhi directs deletion of derivative loss addition, ruling that proper banking channel payments were made. Details of the case explained here.
Pragati Power Corporation Ltd vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) case: Analysis of ITAT decision allowing deduction under section 80IA without offsetting losses from other Industrial Units.
Dive into Prakash Industries Ltd vs ACIT case dissected by ITAT Delhi, detailing FBT exemptions for transport services and medical expenses reimbursement, with expert insights.
ITAT Delhi held that as non-renewal doesn’t amount to termination, accordingly, receipt of compensation on account of non-renewal of contract cannot be taxed under section 28(ii)(e) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that genuineness and veracity of the party cannot be doubted merely because the cold storage rent was received in cash. Accordingly, addition u/s. 69 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained investment unjustified.
ITAT Delhi held that addition u/s. 69 of the Income Tax Act based on working/ seized document retrieved from third person without granting cross examination opportunity to the assessee is unsustainable in law.
