In PCIT vs Inderjit Singh Sodhi (HUF), Delhi High Court examines whether interest on compensation is taxable as income from other sources. Read the detailed analysis.
Merely, because a taxpayer has not filed GST returns for some period does not mean that taxpayer’s registration is required to be cancelled with retrospective date also covering the period when the returns were filed, and taxpayer was compliant.
Delhi High Court overturns retrospective GST registration cancellation due to lack of details in notice and order, orders modification from date of notice.
Impugned GST order dismissed petitioner’s reply as unsatisfactory and lacking substantial documents. court highlighted absence of any request for further details from petitioner, indicating a failure to engage with submitted reply effectively.
Delhi High Court rules that an ex-parte order cannot stand if the taxpayer’s GSTN is cancelled, hindering response. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
Court observed that the petitioner had provided a detailed reply addressing each head of the Show Cause Notice. However, the impugned order merely stated that the reply was not satisfactory without providing any substantive reasoning or analysis. The Court held that this lack of consideration rendered the order unsustainable.
Delhi High Court rules AO can’t deviate from Transfer Pricing Officer’s determined Arm’s Length Price (ALP) in international transactions, upholding assessee’s writ petition.
Delhi High Court modifies retrospectively canceled GST registration in Anil Soni Prop vs Superintendent case. Analysis of court judgment and implications of retrospective cancellation.
Delhi High Court directs detailed response to GST Show Cause Notice regarding disputed principal place of business, suspends registration.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s directive for re-adjudication in Canara Bank’s case against a cryptic order regarding GST demands. Get insights now!
