CESTAT Chennai sets aside revocation of Customs Broker license for Souparnika Shipping Services due to facilitating fraudulent import-export activities.
CESTAT ruling favors Samarth Corporation, negating Customs’ demand for interest and penalties over bond non-furnishing under amended notification.
CESTAT Chennai clarifies the application of Section 27(1B) limitation for refund claims on duty paid under protest, aligning with legal precedents.
CESTAT Chennai held that inclusion of royalty and technical know-how in the assessable value of the imported products unjustified as relationship has not influenced the pricing pattern.
K.H. Leather Industries Private Limited v. Commissioner of GST and Central Excise: Analysis of CESTAT Chennai’s decision on duty exemption for goods not received.
CESTAT Chennai nullifies customs duty demand on 32mm TMT bars in DLF Southern Homes vs. Commissioner of Customs case, citing lack of expertise in adjudicating authority.
CESTAT Chennai quashes customs duty demand against Blue Mount Textiles, citing issuance of show cause notice beyond the normal time limit.
Discover how CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of Commscope Solution (India) Pvt. Ltd., granting customs duty exemption based on the minimum operating voltage of patch cords.
CESTAT Chennai grants relief to ESSA Exports by deeming seized goods as ‘scrap.’ Detailed analysis of the order, including the examination of goods and expert opinions.
CESTAT Chennai held that a decision on classification cannot be made merely because the goods are mentioned as ‘Food Supplement’ by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. Since ingredient of product clearly shows that they have oils of fish, the product is rightly classifiable under CTH 1504 20 20.
