Faze Three Limited vs. C.C.E & S.T.-Silvasa case at CESTAT Ahmedabad: The established principle that order cannot transcend scope of show cause notice forms a robust foundation for contesting validity of demands made.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that demat/depository charges, transaction/ administrative charges and VSAP/TWS charges collected by sub brokers on behalf of the stock exchange are not liable to Service Tax.
CESTAT Ahmedabad’s order in L&T vs. C.C.-Kandla regarding taxability of processed goods leftover after completing export obligations.
Read the CESTAT Ahmedabad order on ONGC Petro’s customs duty remission appeal for imported raw material destroyed in a fire at its SEZ unit. Analysis and insights included.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules software loaded on medium is a sale, not a service, dismissing Service Tax demand. Details of Edukite Software Pvt Ltd vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-I included.
Explore the Ajay Traders vs. C.C.-Mundra case: CESTAT Ahmedabad rejects customs’ reliance on Zuaba portal data, deeming it unauthenticated. Details of the order and key legal arguments.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Shakti Enterprise vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST clarifies that CHA’s reimbursable expenses are not subject to service tax. Explore the judgment’s impact.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of General Motors, allowing CENVAT credit on various services. The decision clarifies eligibility under CENVAT Credit Rules.
Explore the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on ‘Boron Ore’ customs duty exemption under Customs Notification No. 15/2017-CUS. Analysis of the case, legal arguments, and the decision to remand to the Adjudicating Authority for reevaluation. Stay informed on the latest developments in customs regulations.
CENVAT credit denied: CESTAT directed re-adjudication based on ISD invoices mentioning Mumbai address & not related to manufacturing activities.
