Read the ITAT Bangalore order in the case of Space Employees Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO. Learn about delay condonation & Section 80P(2)(d) relief for ISRO Employees Society.
In a case of DCIT Vs Milan Kavin Parikh, ITAT Mumbai dismisses Revenue’s appeal against deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the quantum addition was deleted.
Analysis of Bharat Jaroli vs PCIT case by ITAT Indore, highlighting AO’s failure to scrutinize cash payments under Sec 40A. Detailed review and outcome provided.
ITAT Delhi held that giving effect to uncertainty of revenue recognition, income rightly offered to tax on the basis of receipts. Accordingly, addition of income based on accrual basis deleted.
Expenditure incurred on paintings was allowable as revenue expenditure deeming it essential for creating a conducive business environment and accordingly to be construed as expenditure wholly and exclusively incurred for the purpose of business of assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that AO is bound to follow the directions of DRP. Accordingly, final assessment order passed by AO without implementing direction of DRP makes the assessment order void-ab-initio.
ITAT Delhi in case of KBC India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO held that equity shares were allotted by the assessee to its holding company at premium and in such a scenario no addition can be made u/s 56(2)(viib) of the Act
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling on valuation of shares in DCIT Vs Hometrail Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. case for Assessment Year 2015-16. Analysis, implications, and conclusions discussed.
In Uttam Narayanmal Mehta S K Metal Vs ITO case, ITAT Mumbai directs AO to re-adjudicate mistake in ITR filing regarding double taxation of profit.
In the case of Ketan Prabhulal Dalsaniya Vs DCIT, ITAT Indore rules that once the business income of the wife is accepted during scrutiny, the AO cannot tax the husband again, stating the wife wasn’t the one carrying the business.
