In re Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) The issue before us is the admissibility / maintainability of the instant application and the said admissibility is governed by the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, which reads as under: The Authority shall not admit the application where the question raised […]
In re Pankaj Enterprises (GST AAR Karnataka) The applicant has sought clarification about determination of taxable value of commercial immovable property for the purpose of GST liability i.e whether the sale consideration mentioned in the sale deed between builder and proposed purchaser or guidance value fixed by the state government authorities for the purpose of […]
In re AVS Tech Building Solutions India Pvt (GST AAR Karnataka) The applicant has sought advance ruling, in their application, in respect of the question ‘Whether our supply of goods – Ready Mix Concrete (HSN Code: 38245010) is covered under definition of Continuous supply of Goods under Section 2(32) of the CGST Act 2017?’ AAR […]
In re Teamlease Education Foundation (GST AAR Karnataka) a. Whether, the Applicant is acting as a pure agent of the Industry partner to the extent of reimbursement received towards stipend paid to trainees on behalf of Industry partner as part of training agreement and therefore the said reimbursement is not chargeable to GST? The Applicant […]
In re Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) 1. Whether ITC can be claimed on common services which are utilized for both taxable as well as exempted supplies? Ans : This question is not covered under the issues referred to in Section 97(2) of the CGST Act 2017, in respect which […]
In re C & A Sourcing International Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) applicant vide their letter dated 07.02.2022, received by e-mail, requested this authority to permit them to withdraw their application quoting the reason that the issues have been clarified by the CBIC vide Circular No. 159/15/2021-GST Dated: 20th September 2021 and hence there is no […]
Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited vide their letter dated : 03-02-2022 requested Authority For Advance Ruling, Karnataka to permit them to withdraw their application quoting the commercial reasons.
In re Sri Sairam Gopalkrishna Bhat (GST AAR Karnataka) a. Whether the income earned from conducting Guest Lectures, amounts to or results to as taxable supply of services? The income earned from conducting Guest Lectures, amounts to taxable supply of services as per entry No. (ii) of 21 of Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) […]
In re Sea Men Associates (GST AAR Karnataka) Rate of GST on supply of Outboard Motors to unregistered fishermen and whether the HSN Code for the same is 8407 or 8408?. The Outboard motors (marine engine) and its spare parts supplied for fishing vessel for use as part of the fishing vessel- CTH 8902) shall […]
In re Cmepedia Gerda Huguette Emma Van Hoecke (GST AAR Karnataka) 1. Is paid educational content, which is used by health care professionals or students to fulfill a mandatory demand by their professional body or institute, exempt of tax? The paid education content, which is used by health care professionals or students to fulfill a […]
