In re Teamlease Education Foundation (GST AAR Karnataka)
a. Whether, the Applicant is acting as a pure agent of the Industry partner to the extent of reimbursement received towards stipend paid to trainees on behalf of Industry partner as part of training agreement and therefore the said reimbursement is not chargeable to GST?
The Applicant does not qualify to be a pure agent of the Industry partner to the extent of reimbursement received towards stipend paid to Trainees on behalf of Industry partner as part of training agreement and therefore the said reimbursement is chargeable to GST.
b. Whether, the Applicant is acting as a pure agent of the Industry partner to the extent of reimbursement received against cost of medical and accident insurance obtained for the benefit of trainees by the Applicant and reimbursed by the Industry partner as per the training agreement and therefore the said reimbursement is not chargeable to GST?
The Applicant does not qualify to be a pure agent of the Industry partner to the extent of reimbursement received against cost of medical and accident insurance obtained for the benefit of Trainees by the Applicant and reimbursed by the Industry partner as per the training agreement and therefore the said reimbursement is chargeable to GST.
Read AAAR order: GST payable on reimbursement received of stipend if Appellant not qualifies as pure agent
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA
M/s. Teamlease Education Foundation, (herein after referred to as ‘The Applicant) 6th Floor, BMTC Commercial Complex, 80 Feet Road, Koramangala, Bengaluru-560 095, Karnataka, having GSTIN 29AADCT8958N1ZA, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of Rs.5,000/- each under
2. The Applicant submitted that they are a Section 25 company, registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, incorporated on 27.06.2011; They also obtained registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act 1961; They are engaged in charitable activities with an objective to promote and sponsor educational institutions including universities dedicated to inculcation of domain specific, workplace relevant and life related skills and competences for enhancing employability, work culture, enhanced productivity, economic development, social harmony and social life through offer of technology supported, industry relevant and low-cost academic programs with employment at the heart of academic offerings.
3. In view of the above, the applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of the following questions:
a. Whether, the Applicant is acting as a pure agent of the Industry partner to the extent of reimbursement received towards stipend paid to trainees on behalf of Industry partner as part of training agreement and therefore the said reimbursement is not chargeable to GST ?
b. Whether, the Applicant is acting as a pure agent of the Industry partner to the extent of reimbursement received against cost of medical and accident insurance obtained for the benefit of trainees by the Applicant and reimbursed by the Industry partner as per the training agreement and therefore the said reimbursement is not chargeable to GST ?
4. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE: The applicant furnishes the following relevant facts having a bearing on the questions on which advance ruling has been sought.
4 1 TeamLease Education Foundation (hereinafter referred as ‘Applicant’ or `CLEF’) is a section 25 company, registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in charitable activities and obtained registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act 1961, with an objective to promote and sponsor educational institutions including universities dedicated to inculcation of domain specific, workplace relevant and life related skills and competences for enhancing employability, work culture, enhanced productivity, economic development, social harmony and social life through offer of technology supported, industry relevant and low-cost academic programs with employment at the heart of academic offerings.
4.2 The Applicant is an approved NEEM (National Employability Enhancement Mission) Facilitator under the All India Council for Technical Education (National Employability Enhancement Mission) Regulations, 2017 (“NEEMS Regulations”). The objective of National Employability Enhancement Mission (NEEM) is to offer on the job practical training to enhance employability of a person either pursuing his or her Post-Graduate / Graduate / Diploma in any technical or non-technical stream or has discontinued studies after class 10th to enhance his/her employability.
4.3 As per the NEEM Regulations, a person registered under NEEM Regulations for receiving training is called a Trainee (`NEEM trainee’ or Trainee’). Further, a contract is required to be executed between NEEM Facilitator and the NEEM trainee to capture all terms and conditions (`NEEM contract’). However, the NEEM contract is neither an offer of employment nor a guarantee of employment. Further, the Trainees are entitled for payment of remuneration / stipend under the NEEM Regulations which shall be at par with the prescribed minimum wages for unskilled category. Such remuneration / stipend shall be paid at as a single consolidated amount without any statutory deductions applicable to regular employees viz. PF/ESI etc. since the NEEM contract assures training and does not constitute employment. The NEEM Facilitators are required to partner with various trainers and Employers / Company / Industry (Industry partner) for imparting training to NEEM trainees.
4.4 The Applicant has entered into training agreements with various companies (industry partners) for imparting practical training and has registered them as training partner in accordance with NEEM Regulations. The applicant furnished a copy of sample agreement (training agreement’ or ‘agreement’) with one of the clients M/s LG Electronics India Private Limited (Industry partner’).
4.5 The Industry partner, as per the training agreement, is under the following obligations:
a. Providing adequate facilities (viz. requisite personnel, facilities, industry knowledge and infrastructure) in accordance with the NEEM Regulations for the training.
b. Payment of monthly stipend (`stipend’) to the Applicant for the purpose of paying to the trainees in consideration of dedicated deployment of the trainees and in accordance with the NEEM Regulations.
c. Reimbursement of cost of medical and accident insurance obtained by the Applicant for the benefit of the Trainees.
d. Payment of administrative fee, sourcing fee, fee for enrolment and other fee charged by Applicant towards the services provided in its own account
e. Ensure health, welfare and safety standards during the training and compliance with other terms and conditions as per the agreement.
4.6 The applicant is entrusted with the following obligations as per the training agreement:
a. To execute an agreement with each trainee, prior to deploying the 6).-p \Trainees to the Industry partner for the Training In accordance with NEEM Regulations.
b. Furnish appropriate data to the Industry partner in relation to the Trainees.
c. Undertake administrative tasks as may be required from time to time.
d. Implementation of digit workforce solution (DWS) for attendance and leave management of Trainees.
e. Assistance in enrolment of Trainees under various courses like Bachelor of Management Studies (BMS), etc.
f. Payment of premium towards Medical and Accident Insurance obtained for Trainees for their benefit.
g. Payment of stipend to the trainees engaged by Industry partner at par with the prescribed minimum wages payable for unskilled category under the Shops 8; Establishment Act / Factories Act as applicable.
4.7 The Applicant is charging following amounts from the Industry partner for carrying out the above-mentioned functions:
a. ‘Administration fee’ per trainee per month for assisting the Industry partner with the administrative tasks for deployment of Trainees for the Training.
b. ‘Sourcing fee’ as one-time charge towards sourcing of Trainees.
c. ‘Enrolment fee’ per trainee towards enrolment of Trainees for various courses.
d. Reimbursement of monthly ‘stipend’ paid to Trainees on behalf of Industry partner and in accordance with NEEM Regulations.
e. Reimbursement of cost of medical and accident insurance obtained for welfare of Trainees as agreed with the Industry partner.
4.8 The Applicant, as agreed upon with the Industry partner, raise invoices for the stipend payable to the Trainees and administration fee on a monthly basis including applicable taxes (relevant invoice copy enclosed). Further, the said invoice also includes amount of insurance premium as and when charged.
4.9 Currently, the Applicant is collecting GST on the entire transaction value which is the price payable by Industry partner in accordance with section 15 of the CGST Act which includes administration fee, sourcing fee, enrolment fee and the following reimbursements:
a. Monthly stipend paid to trainees on behalf of Industry partner
b. Cost of medical and accident insurance obtained for benefit of the Trainees and reimbursed by Industry partner.
4.10 However, the Applicant is of the view that the reimbursement received towards stipend and cost of medical and accident insurance is an expenditure or costs incurred as a pure agent of the Industry partner (recipient of supply ) as per rule 33 of the CGST Rules 2017. Therefore, such reimbursements should be excluded from the taxable value and hence, GST should not be charged on such reimbursements.
4.11 Considering the aforesaid facts, the Applicant seeks to obtain a ruling with regard to the questions of law and thus files the instant application.
5 Applicant’s Interpretation of Law : The applicant furnishes their interpretation of law, in respect of the questions on which advance ruling has been sought, as under:
5.1 The Applicant contends that they are acting as pure agent of the Industry partner in as far as providing stipend and incurring cost of insurance and submits the following in their support.
Section 9(1) of the KGST Act prescribes the levy and collection of the Karnataka State Goods and Services Tax which states that, “Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), there shall be levied a tax called the Karnataka State goods and services tax on all intra-state supplies of goods or services or both, except on the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption, on the value determined under section 15 and at such rates, not exceeding twenty per cent., as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council and collected in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be paid by the taxable person.”
5.2 Thus, KGST is levied on the value of supply determined under section 15 of the KGST Act. Now, as per section 15 of the KGST Act:
“(1) The value of a supply of goods or services or both shall be the transaction value, which is the price actually paid or payable for the said supply of goods or services or both where the supplier and the recipient of the supply are not related and the price is the sole consideration for the supply
(2) The value of supply shall include
(a) Any taxes, duties, cesses, fees and charges levied under any law for the time being in force other than this Act, the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, if charged separately by the supplier;
(b) Any amount that the supplier is liable to pay in relation to such supply but which has been incurred by the recipient of the supply and not included in the price actually paid or payable for the goods or services or both;
(c) Incidental expenses, including commission and packing, charged by the supplier to the recipient of a supply and any amount charged for anything done by the supplier in respect of the supply of goods or services or both at the time of, or before delivery of goods or supply of services;
(d) Interest or late fee or penalty for delayed payment of any consideration for any supply; and
(e) Subsidies directly linked to the price excluding subsidies provided by the Central Government and State Governments;
Explanation._ For the purposes of this sub-section, the amount of subsidy shall be included in the value of supply of the supplier who receives the subsidy
(3) The value of the supply shall not include any discount which is given
(a) Before or at the time of the supply if such discount has been duly recorded in the invoice issued in respect of such supply; and
(b) After the supply has been effected, if—
(i) Such discount is established in terms of an agreement entered into at or before the time of such supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices; and
(ii) Input tax credit as is attributable to the discount on the basis of document issued by the supplier has been reversed by the recipient of the supply
(4) Where the value of the supply of goods or services or both cannot be determined under sub-section (1), the same shall be determined in such manner as may be prescribed
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (4), the value of such supplies as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council shall be determined in such manner as may be prescribed.” [Emphasis supplied]
5.3 It is clear from the plain reading of section 15 that KGST is leviable on the transaction value if it satisfies the following conditions:
a. Transaction value should be the price paid or payable for the said supply
b. The supplier and recipient of the supply are not related
c. Price should be the sole consideration for the supply
Further, the transaction value shall include the incidental expenses incurred by the supplier on its own in relation to supply of goods or services or both.
5.4 However, in case, the aforesaid conditions of section 15(1) are not fulfilled, then the value of taxable supply is determined by virtue of section 15(4) which has prescribed Chapter IV of the KGST Rules, 2017 containing various rules (Rule 27 to Rule 35) for determination of value of supply in certain cases.
5.5 One of the such case is determination of value of supply of sevices in case of pure agent as envisaged under Rule 33 of the KGST Rules which prescribes the following:
“Notwithstanding anything contained in the provision of this chapter, the expenditure or costs incurred by a supplier as a pure agent of the recipient of supply shall be excluded from the value of supply, if all the following conditions are satisfied namely-
i. The supplier acts as a pure agent of the recipient of the supply when he makes the payment to the third party on authorisation by such recipient.
ii. The payment made by the pure agent on behalf of the recipient of supply has been separately indicated in the invoice issued by the pure agent to the recipient of service; and
iii. The supplies procured by the pure agent from the third party as a pure agent of the recipient of supply are in addition to the services, he supplies on his own account
Explanation- For this rule, the expression “pure agent” means a person who-
a) Enters into a contractual agreement with the recipient of supply to act as his pure agent to incur expenditure or costs during supply of goods or services or both;
b) Neither intends to hold nor holds any title to the goods or services or both so procured or supplied as pure agent of the recipient of supply;
c) Does not use for his own interest such goods or services so procured; and
d) Receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services in addition to the amount received for supply he provides on his own account.”
[Emphasis supplied]
5.6 From above, it is clear that any cost or expenditure incurred by supplier on behalf of the recipient of service shall be excluded from the value of supply u/s 15 of the KGST Act if the conditions prescribed under Rule 33 are satisfied. However, in case, any cost or expenditure is incurred by supplier on its own account for provision of supply, then such cost or expenditure shall form part of the value of supply.
5.7 In the present case, in order to determine the taxability of various amounts charged by the Applicant from the Industry partner, we need to first evaluate the relevant terms of the agreement which is provided below:
