Initiation of CIRP u/s 9 unsustainable as dispute existed prior to issue of demand notice

Feng Ji Vs Giesecke & Devrient MS India Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi)

NCLAT Delhi held that initiation of CIRP under section 9 of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 2016 unsustainable as dispute regarding credit/refund of the service tax amount existed prior to the issue of demand notice under section 8.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.