Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Did you know that failing to disclose your foreign assets in your Income Tax Return (ITR) can lead to penalties of up to ₹10 lak...
Income Tax : Learn about HRA claims, TDS obligations on rent, and why taxpayers are receiving tax notices. Understand compliance steps to avoid...
Income Tax : Article seeks to explore the contents of New Direct Tax Code, which will be finalised in the coming weeks. Additionally, it aims t...
Income Tax : Learn about Income Tax Department alerts regarding non-deduction of tax on rent under Section 194IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961....
Income Tax : Discover tax planning strategies for managerial decisions with insights on Finance Act 2025 changes. Learn simplified versions of ...
Income Tax : ITAT enables e-filing and virtual hearings; over 26,000 e-filings and 1.22 lakh video hearings conducted till Feb 2025, per Minist...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill 2025 proposes tax exemption on income up to ₹12 lakh, revised tax slabs, and a ₹75,000 standard deduction for...
Income Tax : A summary of corporate tax concessions in India, including key deductions, exemptions, and revenue impact from 2021-24 under the I...
Income Tax : Get insights on key amendments in the Income-tax Act, 1961, including changes to Sections 9A, 44BBD, 10(10D), and 158BB under the ...
Income Tax : JAOs face workload imbalances, limited manpower, and systemic issues post-Faceless Assessment Scheme. Suggestions for better resou...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat rules penalty under Section 271(1)(c) not sustainable where income addition is based on estimation of bogus purchases....
Income Tax : Delhi High Court dismisses B.U. Bhandari firm’s plea for late ITR filing; vague medical grounds and lack of evidence cited for r...
Income Tax : Supreme Court sets aside High Court ruling in S.M. Overseas tax case, restores ITAT order on reassessment under Sections 147/148 o...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai rules on ITO vs. Vaman International P. Ltd., addressing additions under section 69C for disputed purchase transaction...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court reviews PCIT vs. Param Dairy Ltd., addressing additions under Section 69C & 40A(3) for cash milk purchases....
Income Tax : Changes in TDS deductions under Finance Act 2025 include revised thresholds for Sections 194A, 194H, and 80CCA. Effective from Apr...
Income Tax : CBDT mandates Aadhaar intimation for PAN holders who applied before October 1, 2024. Deadline set for December 31, 2025. Know co...
Income Tax : CBDT mandates Aadhaar intimation for PAN holders who applied before October 1, 2024. Know the latest Income Tax Rule amendments ef...
Income Tax : On 29 March 2025, the President of India granted assent to the Finance Act 2025, marking a significant milestone in the country’...
Income Tax : The Karnataka Urban Water Supply & Drainage Board receives tax exemption for specified income from FY 2023-24 to 2027-28 under Sec...
Thane: An income tax officer from Thane has been arrested by the economic offences wing of the police for allegedly masterminding an I-T refund scam and siphoning off public funds close to Rs 4 crore from 2007 to 2009.
The brief facts which give rise to the aforesaid issue are that the Respondent imported Crude Palm Stearin through Kakinada Port and filed Bills of Entry declaring the goods as industrial grade Crude Palm Stearin falling under Ch. Sub Heading No. 15 11 90 90 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975
The assessee had paid a sum of Rs.2 crores to M/s. Procter & Gamble India Ltd (PGI) towards technical know how fees in assessment year 1994-95. The assessee had amortized the expenditure over a period of six years and claimed deduction of Rs.33,33,333/- being 1/6th of the payment during the year.
Recently ITAT , Mumbai held that application for stay before the Tribunal arising out of assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) in pursuance to direction given by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) is maintainable even though no stay application was filed before the lower authorities (tax department).
Gujarat High Court rejected a Scheme of Arrangement (Scheme) filed by Vodafone Essar Gujarat Limited (Petitioner or Company) for demerger of its passive infrastructure assets (PIA) into Vodafone Essar Infrastructure Limited (VEIL) on various grounds including evasion of tax being primary motive behind the Scheme and also non conformity with essential elements of Section 391/394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Companies Act).
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) — the nodal office for the income tax department — has decided to settle all income tax refunds pertaining till 2009-10 by the end of the current fiscal. With the Central Processing Centre operational,
Swatanter Kumar J.- Before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, the Income-tax Officer, Ward-II New Delhi, while preferring an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dated December 1, 1999, relating to the assessing year 1996-97, raised the following issue
Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the dividend received by the assessee on the shares held by him as stock-in-trade of his share business was earned income ?
the assessee-company had made various payments to its holding company M/s. Alstom Holdings, France but no deductions of tax at source were made. – there is justification for the assessee’s conviction at the time of payment that no tax was deductible at source. It was neither a composite payment.
Mumbai bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) held that interest income earned on fixed deposit made for the purpose of business should be considered as business income and not as income from other sources. Further, the Tribunal held that salary and welfare expenses of taxpayer’s staff will not be covered under section 44C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) since the expenses are directly related to the Indian Project. The Tribunal also held that the payment made for procurement services cannot be considered to be a payment towards fees for technical services as per India-Korea Tax Treaty (the tax treaty) since procurement services were purely commercial in nature and had nothing to do with rendering of any technical managerial or consultancy services.
