Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The MOOWR scheme offers deferred duties, export benefits, and operational ease for manufacturers in India, aiding growth but facin...
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : Delhi HC rules that CESTAT cannot dismiss an appeal solely due to pre-deposit being made in the wrong account. Case sent back for ...
Excise Duty : Delhi HC rules CESTAT cannot dismiss an appeal for incorrect pre-deposit allocation when rules were unclear, directing a fresh hea...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Delhi rules against Leel Electricals Ltd., denying CENVAT Credit on ineligible invoices. The tribunal upholds tax demand an...
Excise Duty : The appellant herein has merely utilized the credit and, to the extent that rule 3(4) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has not been sh...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Delhi overturns ₹10 lakh penalty under Rule 26(1), citing the absence of confiscation, a key requirement for imposing pen...
Excise Duty : Govt extends provisions under Excise Notification 11/2017 from 2025 to 2026. Changes take effect on February 2, 2025....
Excise Duty : Notification 01/2025 outlines appointments and roles of Central Excise Officers for handling appeals under the Excise Act, specify...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notification No. 08/2022 with immediate effect under public interest provisions....
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance amends Central Excise Rules, 2017, removing specific provisos in Rules 18 and 19. Changes take effect imme...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notifications No. 10/2022 and 11/2022 under Notification No. 30/2024, effective im...
Circular No. 37/37/94-CX It has been represented that manufacturer of leather goods like Jackets/Wallets/bags etc, are being asked to get the central excise registration by the Central Excise Collectorates even though their clearances for home consumption is well within the exemption limit. It is further stated that they are being directed to observe regular AR4/AR4 A procedure as their clearances for export has exceeded the limit of Rs. two crores as provided in the small scale exemption notification.
Cir. No. 36/36/94-CX.8 The Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-II has expressed certain doubts as to the accounting of scrap of metals and other materials arising during the course of manufacture of various excisable products, for the purpose of levy of excise duty consequent upon the changes brought about by Budget 1994-95. A copy of his letter is enclosed for ready reference.
Cir. No. 35/35/94-CX Board has received the references regarding procedure to be followed in case prosecution to be launched where there is one. Adjudicating Officer for number of factories located under jurisdiction of different Collectorates.
Circular No. 34/34/94-CX I am directed to state that after the introduction of invoice-based assessment procedure, a number of representations have been received from various quarters on the implementation of the new procedure. These representations have been examined and the following instructions for guidance.
Cir. No. 32/32/94-CX I am directed to refer to Board’s instructions contained in F.No. 289/10/91-CX.9 dated 18.3.91 under which powers have been delegated to the Principal Collectors of Central Excise to grant, in individual cases, the facility of payment of Central Excise dues in upto 12 installments on merits.
I am directed to refer to Boards letter F.No. 208/61/92-CX.6, dated 04/041996, whereby the Boards Circular No. 15/90-CX. 6, dated 09/08/1990 was modified so as to enhance the monetary limit for launching prosecution from Rs. 1 lakh To Rs. 5 lakhs.
Circular No. 30/30/94-CX Instructions contained in the aforesaid letter envisage that before launching any prosecution, it is necessary that the department should have evidence to prove that the person, company or individual had guilty knowledge of the offence or had fraudulent intention to commit the offence or in any manner possessed mens-rea (mental element) which would indicate his guilt
Cir. No. 29/29/94-CX I am directed to invite your attention to the provisions of Rules 52A and 173C of Central Excise Rules, 1944, as introduced by Notification No. 4/94-CE(NT) dated 1.3.94. These provisions come into force w.e.f. 1st April, 1994.
Cir. No. 28/28/94-CX In continuation of this Department”s letter of even number dated 21.07.93 it is informed that vide sub-clause (a) of clause 63 of the Finance Bill, 1994, section 3(3) of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 has been imposed to be amended so as to explicitly provide that the provisions of the Central Excise Act and Rules made thereunder relating to Offences and Penalties shall be applicable in respect of this Act also.
Cir.No. 25/25/94-CX It has been brought to the Board”s notice that there is no uniformity in the crediting of the collected on account of sale of rejects and 25% of production into Domestic Tariff Area by the EPZ/100% EOUs. This has been examined and it is clarified that such duty is charged under section 3 of the Central Excise & Salt Act and therefore it should be credited under the sub-head “0038 – Union Excise Duties”.
