Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Punjab & Haryana HC grants relief to son of a soldier injured in anti-terror operation in J&K, asserting his entitlement to a job ...
Corporate Law : Understand the applicability, compliance, penalties, and best practices of the POSH Act for Private Limited Companies in India wit...
Corporate Law : Learn how companies can build stakeholder trust through communication, engagement, transparency, and a structured redressal mechan...
Corporate Law : Trademarks are critical for businesses to differentiate their goods or offerings from others in market. They help construct brand...
Corporate Law : Understanding conveyance & deemed conveyance in housing societies, legal provisions, benefits, and challenges under MOFA, RERA, an...
Corporate Law : IBBI denies RTI appeal citing fiduciary exemption under Section 8(1)(e). The requested MSME-related information was withheld. Appe...
Corporate Law : The National Pension System (NPS) offers flexible, low-cost pension options with digital accessibility, aiming to expand coverage ...
Corporate Law : ICAI held its Convocation 2025 across 13 locations, awarding 19,075 Chartered Accountants with membership. The Governor of West Be...
Corporate Law : The Indian government has not assessed the IBC’s impact on tax revenue loss and has no plans to amend tax priorities under insol...
Corporate Law : IBBI proposes key amendments to CIRP, liquidation, and personal guarantor insolvency, aiming to enhance efficiency, transparency, ...
Corporate Law : Held that while considering the term “unfair trade practice”, this Court has found that such one-sided Agreements, as in the p...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that the discontinuation of the Appellant Workmen’s services, effected without compliance with Section 6E and...
Corporate Law : Madras High Court held that Section 10-A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be extended to cases where default con...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC quashes order by Additional CIT, emphasizing CBDT or its members must explicitly issue orders under Section 119(2)(b) of...
Corporate Law : NCLAT upholds rejection of IBC Section 9 application against HUL, citing pre-existing disputes and claims below the Rs. 1 crore th...
Corporate Law : IBBI’s First Appellate Authority reviews RTI appeals by Kairav Anil Trivedi, addressing disclosure requests under the RTI Act. K...
Corporate Law : IBBI updates reporting rules for insolvency professionals, requiring timely assignment updates on its portal for CIRP, liquidation...
Corporate Law : PFRDA issues a master circular on service charges for PoPs under NPS (All Citizen & Corporate) and NPS-Lite, consolidating past ci...
Corporate Law : IBBI issues a disciplinary order against Akash Shinghal for non-compliance with CIRP regulations. The case involves voting and CoC...
Corporate Law : IBBI Disciplinary Committee reviews the case of Insolvency Professional Anil Kumar Mittal for excessive fees during CIRP proceedin...
Section 16(3)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) requires the Adjudicating Authority (AA) to make a reference to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Board) for recommendation of an insolvency professional (IP) who may act as an interim resolution professional (IRP)
1. SC accepted the submission of Government which has stated that (i) The Union government has extended the deadline for Aadhaar linkage with all schemes of its Ministries/Departments until 31 March 2018; (ii) As far as Aadhaar linkage with bank accounts is concerned, for existing bank accounts, the last date for the completion of the process may be extended to 31 March 2018;
In this editorial author discusses Judgment National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in the case of Steamline Industries Ltd Vs. Tecpro Systems Ltd with reference to Section 14(1)(a) and 238 of the nsolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC, 2016) on the issue Whether Pending Proceeding before Honourable High Court can be peruse after declaration of Moratorium in IBC, 2016
In this editorial author discuss the provisions under of I&B Code, 2016 in respect of different – 2 time limits mentioned under the Act i.e. Section 12. (1) Subject to sub-section (2), the corporate insolvency resolution process shall be completed within a period of one hundred and eighty days from the date of admission of the application to initiate such process.
The ‘I&B Code’ is a complete Code by itself. The provision of the Power of Attorney Act, 1882 cannot override the specific provision of a statute which requires that a particular act should be done by a person in the manner as prescribed thereunder. Therefore, we hold that a ‘Power of Attorney Holder’ is not competent to file an application on behalf of a ‘Financial Creditor’ or ‘Operational Creditor’ or ‘Corporate Applicant’
In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 196 read with section 240 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016), the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified the IBBI (Information Utilities) Regulations, 2017 which seek to provide a framework for registration and regulation of information utilities.
Government Panel invites suggestions/comments from stakeholders about the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Rules and Regulations notified there under
NCLT, Hyderabad quashes 75% vote requirement under section 30(4) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in in K. Shashidhar vs. Kamineni Steel & Power Pvt. Ltd.
It has been decided that irrespective of the amount, the EPF claimant should submit cancelled cheque in original (containing claimant’s name, bank account number & IFS Code of the bank branch printed on it) with all type of claims.
The complainant, who is a resident in a completed building in the above registered project, has filed this complaint seeking directions of MahaRERA to the respondent to allow him to park his vehicle inside the compound wall of the building. The Complainant has further alleged that the Respondent is selling open car parking by collecting in cash without any documentation.
